{"id":60,"date":"2018-01-14T20:53:31","date_gmt":"2018-01-14T20:53:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/134.169.6.169\/milq\/?page_id=60"},"modified":"2026-04-10T10:25:34","modified_gmt":"2026-04-10T08:25:34","slug":"13-wasserstoff-atom","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.milq.info\/en\/mehr\/13-wasserstoff-atom\/","title":{"rendered":"Lesson 13: The hydrogen atom"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>

<\/p>\n

13.1 Energy levels of the hydrogen atom by means of box-shaped potential approximation<\/a>\u00a0–\u00a013.2 Determination of the potential well width<\/a>\u00a0–\u00a013.3 Determination of the potential well depth<\/a>
\n13.4 Determination of the energy values<\/a>\u00a0–\u00a013.5 Progress check<\/a>\u00a0–\u00a013.6 Summary<\/a><\/p>\n

In this lesson, a standard problem of quantum physics is considered: The hydrogen atom. You will learn about a method which can be used to calculate the energy levels approximately with tools available in schools. The Coulomb potential of the nucleus is replaced here by a suitably adapted box-shaped potential.\u00b9 This method has the advantage that all approximations have already been carried out in the classical potential. The subsequent quantum mechanical calculation is then conducted without any approximations.<\/p>\n

If you have not already done so, please now download Chapter 13 of the teaching materials as a pdf file.<\/a><\/p>\n

13.1 Energy values of the hydrogen atom by means of box-shaped potential approximation<\/h3>\n

With the hydrogen atom, a single electron is present in the Coulomb potential of the atomic nucleus. It cannot possess arbitrary values of the total energy; its energy is quantized. The discussion of the energy quantization in the hydrogen atom is a key aspect of the atomic physics lesson.<\/p>\n

The\u00a0 \u00a0quantum mechanical calculation of the energy levels of the hydrogen atom\u00a0<\/a>cannot be carried out in schools. We are restricted to simplified models and approximations. The most frequently used method is to go back to Bohr\u2019s model of the atom ( overview of the approaches to the hydrogen atom used in school textbooks)<\/a>.<\/p>\n

However: If we say the objective of the quantum physics lesson is to turn our backs on classical ways of thinking, then using Bohr\u2019s model of the atom is problematic, because the electrons circle on well-defined orbits here, as they do according to classical physics. We have to fall back on concepts which no longer have a justification in quantum mechanics (positions and paths of electrons), which foster classical, incorrect ideas in the minds of the pupils.<\/p>\n

The Coulomb potential of the atomic nucleus is replaced by a \u201csimilar\u201d potential: By a box-shaped potential with infinitely high potential walls. More precisely, it is a three-dimensional, box-shaped potential well with width \"2R\" and the energy difference “W_0” between the \u201cbottom\u201d of the potential well and the zero point of the energy. We have to find values for the width and the energy difference so that the potential well approximates the Coulomb potential as well as possible.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

13.2 Determination of the potential well width<\/h3>\n

In classical physics, a bound electron (energy \"E\") cannot leave \"R\", because its potential energy would otherwise be greater than its total energy.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

The turning point is therefore characterized by the fact that the kinetic energy is zero; the total energy \"E_{ges}\" is then equal to the potential energy:<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ E_{ges}=−e24\pi\epsilon_0R \]\"<\/p>\n

or solving for \"R\":<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ R=−e24\pi\epsilon_0E_{ges} \]\"<\/p>\n

The maximum distance \"R\" is therefore a function of the energy \"E_{tot}\".<\/p>\n

We have thus obtained a classical estimate for the region in which the electron is to be found. The Coulomb potential is replaced by a potential well of width \"2R\" in our model; within this region, the potential is assumed to be constant, the region outside is not accessible to the electron (infinitely high potential walls).<\/p>\n

13.3 Determination of the potential well depth<\/h3>\n

If we want to solve this problem graphically and without the mathematics still required for the slightly more exact averaging of the Coulomb potential over a sphere with radius \"R\"<\/a>, we take the following route:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

As we can see from the graph, for \"r < R\" the potential is always below the horizontal line at the total energy \"E_{tot}\". The value of \"W_0\" must therefore be below Etot. We obtain a simple estimate by specifying that \"W_0\" should have the value of the Coulomb potential at the position\u00a0\"r =\frac{1}{2} R\"\u00a0(graph). The following therefore applies (inserting the expression for \"R\" (cf. above)):<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ W_0 = W\left(r=\frac{1}{2}R\right) = W \left(r=-\frac{1}{2}\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0E}\right) \]\"<\/p>\n

With the explicit expression for the Coulomb potential \"W\", this gives:<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ W_0=\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0} \cdot 2 \cdot \frac{4\pi\epsilon_0E}{e^2} \]\"<\/p>\n

and the final result for \"W_0\" is:<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ W= 2 \cdot E_{ges} = -2 \cdot |E_{ges}|. \]\"<\/p>\n

Potential problem in understanding when matching the zero point of the energy.<\/a><\/p>\n

13.4 Determination of the energy values<\/h3>\n

The classical model potential, which provides a good approximation for the Coulomb potential, is specified by the results obtained so far. The parameters of the three-dimensional, infinite potential well were determined to be<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ W_0=2 \cdot E_{ges} \]\"<\/p>\n

and<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ R = \frac{e^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 |E_{ges}|} \hspace{35pt} (1) \]\"<\/p>\n

.
\nWe can now continue with the quantum mechanical calculation of the energy values.
\nThe energy levels for the three-dimensional potential<\/a> well\u00a0are already known:<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ E_{ges} = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2m(2R)^2} \cdot (n^2_x + n^2_y + n^2_z) + W_0 \hspace{35pt} (2), \]\"<\/p>\n

with the electron mass m and the quantum numbers \"n_x, n_y, n_z\". We limit ourselves to states which do not distinguish a specific spatial direction. Then\u00a0\"n_x = n_y = n_z =:n\"\u00a0applies so that the electron state is described by only a single quantum number \"n\". The energy levels from Equation \"(2)\" then become<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ E_{ges} = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2m(2R)^2} \cdot 3n^2 + W_0 \hspace{35pt} (3). \]\"<\/p>\n

If we insert the parameters \"R\" and \"W_0\" determined above, we obtain:<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ E_{ges} = \frac{\hbar^2 \pi^2}{2m} \cdot 3n^2 \cdot \frac{(4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2 E^2_{ges}}{4e^4} +2E_{ges} \]\"<\/p>\n

and from this<\/p>\n

  <\/span>   <\/span>\"\[ E_{ges} = - \frac{16}{3 \pi^2} \cdot \frac{me^4}{2 \hbar^2 (4 \pi \epsilon_0)^2} \cdot \frac{1}{n^2} \]\"<\/p>\n

This is the final result of our model calculation for the hydrogen atom. If we compare this to the exact result, we find that the energy levels are correct apart from the factor \"16/3 \pi^2 = 0.54\".<\/p>\n

Advantages and disadvantages of this method<\/a><\/p>\n

\n
\n

\u00b9 W. R. Theis, Begr\u00fcndung diskreter Eigenwerte f\u00fcr gebundene Zust\u00e4nde ohne L\u00f6sung der Eigenwertgleichung, Physik und Didaktik 22 (3), 198 (1994)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

13.5 Progress check<\/h3>\n

The following points were important in this chapter:<\/p>\n